Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40510060›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Clinical and Environmental Harms of Quaternary Ammonium Disinfectants and the Promise of Ultraviolet-C (UV-C) Alternatives: A Narrative Review.

Mitchell K Ng, Michael A Mont, Peter M Bonutti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mitchell K NgOrthopedic Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, USA.
Michael A MontOrthopedic Surgery, LifeBridge Health, Baltimore, USA.
Peter M BonuttiOrthopedic Surgery, Sarah Bush Lincoln Bonutti Clinic, Effingham, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs) are widely used disinfectants whose application expanded dramatically during the COVID-19 pandemic, raising concerns about long-term safety and environmental impact. This narrative review begins by outlining the chemical structure, mechanisms of action, and widespread use of QACs across healthcare, consumer, and industrial settings. We examine toxicologic findings from in vitro and animal studies, highlighting mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and reproductive toxicity at low-dose exposures. Clinical and public health data are reviewed, linking QAC exposure to respiratory symptoms, dermatitis, and potential reproductive risks among healthcare workers and other vulnerable populations. Environmental harms are also discussed, including QAC persistence in soil and water, ecotoxicity in aquatic species, and potential for bioaccumulation. We then explore ultraviolet-C (UV-C) disinfection as a non-chemical alternative, demonstrating comparable antimicrobial efficacy without the toxicological or ecological drawbacks of QACs. Despite the growing use of QACs, few studies have comprehensively reviewed their adverse effects or evaluated UV-C as a viable substitute. This narrative review fills a critical gap by synthesizing current evidence across disciplines and highlighting the need for safer disinfection practices. We advocate for the broader adoption of UV-C technologies to reduce chemical exposure, protect public health, and promote environmental sustainability.

Indexed as

chemical disinfectantscovid-19disinfection efficiencyquaternary ammonium compoundsuv-c

Identifiers

PMID40510060
PMCPMC12160957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.