ArticleInternational journal of therapeutic massage & bodywork2025
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Deep Transverse Frictional Massage Combined with Conventional Physiotherapy for Tendinopathies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Article in International journal of therapeutic massage & bodywork, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tendinopathies are common musculoskeletal disorders characterized by pain and functional impairment, often requiring therapeutic interventions for effective management. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of deep transverse frictional massage (DTFM) combined with conventional therapy for the treatment of tendinopathies. Methods: A study search of electronic databases including MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and PubMed databases, was conducted for randomized controlled trials, pilot study, and comparative study design comparing the combined application of DTFM with conventional physiotherapy (e.g., exercise, stretching, or modalities) to conventional therapy alone for the treatment of tendinopathies. Inclusion criteria were studies that reported clinical outcomes such as pain reduction and disability. Data extraction was performed independently by reviewers. A meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models to estimate the pooled effect size, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I Results: A total of 13 studies met the inclusion criteria. The combined treatment group (DTFM + conventional therapy) showed significant improvements in pain reduction (standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.70 to -0.14, p < 0.05) and disability in the shoulder (SMD = -15.05, 95% CI: -15.60 to -14.50, p < 0.05) and elbow (SMD = -2.67, 95% CI: -3.38 to -1.96, p < 0.05) compared to conventional therapy alone. No significant adverse effects were reported. Conclusion: The findings suggest that DTFM, when combined with conventional therapy, offers significant benefits over conventional therapy alone in the management of tendinopathies, particularly in reducing pain and improving function. The exact physiological mechanisms through which DTFM works in combination with conventional therapies remain unclear. Research into how DTFM influences tissue healing, collagen remodeling, or pain reduction pathways could provide more insights into its effectiveness and guide its integration into treatment protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.