ArticleGenetics2025
Evolution of GC-biased gene conversion by natural selection.
Article in Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Why recombination hotspots?PLoS genetics · 2026Review
- Big Spider, Big Genome: Chromosome-Level Genome of a North American Tarantula (Aphonopelma marxi) and Comparative Genomics Across 300 Million Years of Spider Evolution.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Estimating Gene Conversion Tract Length and Rate From PacBio HiFi Data.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
GC-biased gene conversion is a recombination-associated evolutionary process that biases the segregation ratio of AT:GC polymorphisms in the gametes of heterozygotes, in favor of GC alleles. This process is the major determinant of the variation in base composition across the human genome and can be the cause of a substantial burden of deleterious GC alleles. While the importance of GC-biased gene conversion in molecular evolution is increasingly recognized, the reasons for its existence and its variation in intensity between species remain largely unknown. Using simulations and semi-analytical approximations, we investigated the evolution of GC-biased gene conversion as a quantitative trait evolving by mutation, drift, and natural selection. We show that in a finite population in which most mutations are deleterious, GC-biased gene conversion is under weak stabilizing selection around a positive value that mainly depends on the intensity of the mutational bias and on the selective constraints exerted on the genome. Importantly, the levels of GC-biased gene conversion that evolve by natural selection do not minimize the load in the population and even increase it substantially in regions of high recombination rate. Therefore, even if they reduce the fitness of the population, the levels of GC-biased gene conversion currently observed in humans may, in fact, have been (weakly) positively selected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.