ReviewThe Plant cell2025
Advancing ecological and evolutionary research in Arabidopsis: Extending insights into model and nonmodel plants.
Review in The Plant cell, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interactive Effects of Genes and Environment on Vegetative and Reproductive Tradeoffs of Leaf Size Mutants.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Locally adapted Arabidopsis thaliana accessions show transcriptomic plasticity in a multi-timescale analysis of whole-genome gene expression in a natural environment.Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany) · 2026Article
- Polymorphisms for Defence and Virulence in theViruses · 2026Article
- Does genetic variation in controlled experiments predict phenology of wild plants?Journal of evolutionary biology · 2026Article
- In defense of funding foundational plant science.The Plant cell · 2025Article
- Focus on Translational Research from Arabidopsis to Crop Plants and Beyond.The Plant cell · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Arabidopsis is regarded as the gold standard among plant systems because it has generated knowledge with translational potential across various disciplines. Nevertheless, the influence of less-explored fields within the Arabidopsis community, such as ecology and evolutionary ecology, has yet to be synthesized to emphasize their contributions to other plant disciplines. This essay summarizes current eco-evolutionary knowledge in Arabidopsis and highlights its potential to enrich the insights made by the Arabidopsis community as well as others working with other plant models and nonmodel systems. We underline the value of accession-based approaches but also highlight the importance for developing population-based approaches to understand how and where evolutionary change begins. Furthermore, we focus on the evolutionary value of phenotypic plasticity as necessary to comprehend the response of organisms to environmental changes. We also elaborate on conceptual and technical challenges to transcriptomic studies conducted in field conditions that evaluate gene function and gene effect on integrated phenotypes in natural environments. Overall, we believe that the development of joint eco-evolutionary and genetic research in Arabidopsis can help other plant species to develop as model systems, but the Arabidopsis community should also look at the advances of other emerging plant model systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.