ReviewClinical chemistry2025
Advances in Syphilis Diagnostics to Address the 21st-Century Epidemic.
Review in Clinical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Utilization and Performance of a Rapid Treponemal Antibody Test for Diagnosis of Syphilis in a High-Risk Population at an Urban County Hospital.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2026Article
- An Exploratory Study of Host Plasma Proteomic Signatures that Distinguish Secondary and Early Latent Syphilis in Adults.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Mechanisms, management and prevention of anorectal sexually transmitted infections.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Review
- Technological innovations and breakthrough pathways in syphilis diagnosis: addressing global resurgence and the journey toward elimination.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Review
- Unexpected non-reactive nontreponemal serology in secondary syphilis: The prozone phenomenon and clinician-laboratory communication.Southern African journal of infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFor 20 years, the United States has experienced a progressive rise in syphilis cases, increasing to >209 000 cases in 2023. The current case rate of 62.5 per 100 000 persons represents a 30-fold increase since 2000-2001, when a concerted national effort nearly eliminated the disease. This review highlights epidemiologic trends, current gold-standard diagnostic methods, emerging diagnostic tests, and key challenges for laboratorians. CONTENT: The current outbreak in the United States has been marked by dramatic increases in cases among women and men who have sex with women, resulting in 3800 congenital cases in 2023: a 10-fold rise over the last decade. Containing syphilis has been hampered by several factors. Recurrent shortages of the primary treatment, benzathine penicillin G, and a high prevalence of macrolide resistance have curtailed access to single-dose treatment options, necessitating multiday courses of doxycycline. The etiologic agent, Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum, is a stealth pathogen with protean manifestations, thus posing a clinical challenge. Diagnostic testing, which has seen few updates in decades, has limited sensitivity in early or latent syphilis, and the need to integrate multiple serologic tests can delay turnaround times. SUMMARY: Public health interventions, such as doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis, have started to contain the disease, and newer diagnostic tests may offer useful adjuncts for case finding. Serologic testing, with low cost and high sensitivity, is likely to remain the primary method for the screening and diagnosis of syphilis. Sustained investment in public health infrastructure and automation, interlaboratory data sharing, and addressing social determinants of health are critical to the reduction of syphilis cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.