ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2025
Associations between vaccination clinic factors and DTaP dropout in China: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diphtheria, tetanus, and acellular pertussis combined vaccine (DTaP) dropout reflects negatively on the ability of a vaccination clinic to ensure children are fully vaccinated with recommended vaccines. Our study examined associations between modifiable vaccination clinic factors and DTaP dropout in clinics in China. A cross-sectional study of 42,282 clinics used clinic-reported clinic-level factors and clinic-level vaccination data from the National Immunization Information Management System and the Coding Management System during calendar year 2021. We defined low dropout as < 5% and high dropout as ≥ 5%. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed clinics having 18%-25% of their area devoted to vaccination were more likely to have low dropout rates than clinics with ≤ 17% (OR = 1.09 [95% CI, 1.03-1.16]. Clinics with 2, 3, 4, and ≥ 5 vaccination tables were more likely to have low dropout rates compared with single-table clinics (OR = 1.21 [1.13-1.30]; OR = 1.29 [1.20-1.38]; OR = 1.28 [1.17-1.39]; OR = 1.32 [1.20-1.45]). Clinics with 4-5, 6-8, and ≥ 9 staff were more likely to have low dropout rates compared with clinics with ≤ 3 staff (OR = 1.13 [1.07-1.20]; OR = 1.18 [1.10-1.25]; OR = 1.15 [1.08-1.23]). Compared to clinics with travel-based service radii of ≤ 5 km, clinics with 6-10 km radii were more likely to have low dropout rates (OR = 1.06 [95% CI,1.00-1.12]), and clinics with service radii of ≥ 21 km (OR = 0.90 [95% CI, 0.83-0.98]) were less likely. These four factors were independently associated with DTaP dropout. While considering environmental factors such as population size and level of economic development, these factors can be adjusted to help minimize dropout.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.