ArticleAnnals of botany2026
Characterizing and distinguishing the earliest woody euphyllophytes based on secondary xylem anatomy: method development and application.
Article in Annals of botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsThe oldest vascular cambial growth (woody growth) has been recognized in several Early Devonian (ca. 410-395 Ma) euphyllophytes. Incomplete preservation of these fossils, in multiple cases, makes it difficult to evaluate their taxonomic diversity, in the absence of quantitative methods for distinguishing plants based on secondary xylem anatomy. In turn, this hinders understanding of their implications for the evolution of plant development. To develop and apply metrics that quantify secondary xylem anatomy and allow for conclusive comparisons, we investigated extant and Early Devonian fossil woody taxa.
methodsWe developed multiple metrics for quantifying tracheid size as a function of position in the secondary xylem and tested them against a dataset of extant gymnosperm wood. The four metrics that showed consistent trends within taxa and captured differences among taxa were then applied to previously recognized Early Devonian fossil woody taxa and to previously undescribed Early Devonian woody specimens to compare them and evaluate taxonomic diversity and placement of the new fossils. KEY
resultsThe four new secondary xylem metrics, considered alongside other anatomical characters, differentiated the previously recognized Early Devonian taxa from each other, allowed assignment of two of the new fossils to the previously described species Franhueberia gerriennei and separated two new woody euphyllophyte taxa.
conclusionsThe metrics developed here for quantifying secondary xylem anatomy are effective in demonstrating conspecificity and in separating distinct woody taxa, especially in combination with data on the primary xylem and xylem rays. They provide a new method for assessing the taxonomic placement of fossils with incomplete preservation, opening up a new avenue for exploring fossil plant diversity and for characterizing anatomy, with implications for the evolution of plant development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.