ArticleJournal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID2025
Narrative Practice in Investigative Interviews of Individuals With Intellectual Disability.
Article in Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIndividuals with intellectual disabilities are amongst the groups most vulnerable to sexual crimes. However, their limited cognitive abilities can make it challenging to obtain detailed statements from victims during investigative interviews. This study examined whether practising answering open-ended questions early in the interview increases the accuracy and abundance of incident-related information provided by individuals with intellectual disability.
methodForty-eight adults with intellectual disabilities and 32 children without disabilities aged 5-7 were interviewed about a photography event.
resultsWhen practising with open-ended questions, adults with intellectual disability and children without disabilities gave greater detail than those whose practise narrative involved specific questions. Furthermore, both groups provided more information in response to open-ended questions. No effects were observed for inaccurate details.
conclusionNarrative practices could afford individuals with intellectual disability the opportunity to familiarise themselves with open-ended prompts, enabling them to provide more information during the substantive phase of the interview.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.