Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40509753›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2025

Mapping the loss of flagellar motility across the tree of life.

Jamiema Sara Philip, Sehhaj Grewal, Jacob Scadden, Caroline Puente-Lelievre, Nicholas J Matzke, Luke McNally, Matthew A B Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jamiema Sara PhilipSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, 2033, Australia.
Sehhaj GrewalSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, 2033, Australia.
Jacob ScaddenSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, 2033, Australia.
Caroline Puente-LelievreSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.
Nicholas J MatzkeSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.
Luke McNallyInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3FL, United Kingdom.
Matthew A B BakerSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, 2033, Australia.

Funding

Australian Research Project Discovery Project DP240100462HFSP RGY0072/21US Navy Office of Naval Research N62909-22-1-2051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial swimming is mostly powered by the bacterial flagellar motor and the number of proteins involved in the flagellar motor can vary. Quantifying the proteins present in flagellar motors from a range of species delivers insight into how motility has changed throughout history and provides a platform for estimating from its genome whether a species is likely to be motile. We conducted sequence and structural homology searches for 54 flagellar pathway proteins across 11 365 bacterial genomes and developed a classifier with up to 95% accuracy that could predict whether a strain was motile or not. We then mapped the evolution of flagellar motility across the Genome Taxonomy Database bacterial tree of life. We confirmed that the last common bacterial ancestor had flagellar motility and that the rate of loss of this motility was four-fold higher than the rate of gain. We showed that the presence of filament protein homologues was highly phylogenetically correlated with motility and that all species classified as motile contained at least one filament homologue. We calculated the rate of gain and loss for each flagellar protein and that the filament protein FliC was highly correlated with motility across the tree of life. We then measured the correlation of each flagellar motor protein with FliC and showed that the filament, rotor, and rod and hook proteins were all highly correlated with FliC, and thus with motility. We calculated the differential rates of gain and loss for each flagellar protein and quantified which genomes encoded for partial sets of flagellar proteins, indicating potential pathways by which motility could be lost. Overall, we show that filament, rod and hook and rotor proteins are conserved when flagellar motility is preserved and that the presence or absence of a FliC homologue is a good, simple predictor of whether or not a species has flagellar motility.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacterial Physiological PhenomenaBacterial ProteinsEvolution, MolecularFlagellaGenome, BacterialPhylogenyBacterial Proteinsbacterial motilitychemotaxisflagellar motorflagellinFlagellumgene lossphylogenetic trait analysissequence homologystructural homology

Identifiers

PMID40509753
PMCPMC12199754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.