Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40509628›Full record

ArticleAdvanced healthcare materials2025

Biphasic Granular Bioinks for Biofabrication of High Cell Density Constructs for Dermal Regeneration.

Rozalin Shamasha, Sneha Kollenchery Ramanathan, Kristin Oskarsdotter, Fatemeh Rasti Boroojeni, Aleksandra Zielińska, Sajjad Naeimipour, Philip Lifwergren, Nina Reustle, Lauren Roberts, Annika Starkenberg and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced healthcare materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Rozalin ShamashaExperimental Plastic Surgery, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, 581 83, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1494-6182
Sneha Kollenchery RamanathanLaboratory of Molecular Materials, Division of Biophysics and Bioengineering, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Linköping University, Linköping, 581 83, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5562-840X
Kristin OskarsdotterDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, 405 30, Sweden.
Fatemeh Rasti BoroojeniLaboratory of Molecular Materials, Division of Biophysics and Bioengineering, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Linköping University, Linköping, 581 83, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3346-4755
Aleksandra ZielińskaExperimental Plastic Surgery, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, 581 83, Sweden.
Sajjad NaeimipourLaboratory of Molecular Materials, Division of Biophysics and Bioengineering, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Linköping University, Linköping, 581 83, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8491-8155
Philip LifwergrenLaboratory of Molecular Materials, Division of Biophysics and Bioengineering, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Linköping University, Linköping, 581 83, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2760-486X
Nina ReustleLaboratory of Molecular Materials, Division of Biophysics and Bioengineering, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Linköping University, Linköping, 581 83, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4019-4714
Lauren RobertsExperimental Plastic Surgery, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, 581 83, Sweden.
Annika StarkenbergExperimental Plastic Surgery, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, 581 83, Sweden.
Gunnar KratzExperimental Plastic Surgery, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, 581 83, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0476-2155
Peter ApelgrenDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, 405 30, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0451-7771
Karin SäljöDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, 405 30, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2839-9362
Jonathan RakarExperimental Plastic Surgery, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, 581 83, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0992-2549
Lars KölbyDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, 405 30, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9808-5935
Daniel AiliLaboratory of Molecular Materials, Division of Biophysics and Bioengineering, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Linköping University, Linköping, 581 83, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7001-9415
Johan JunkerExperimental Plastic Surgery, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, 581 83, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3708-1978

Funding

Erling-Persson Foundation 2021 008European Research Council 101 044 665Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse 2021.0186Region Östergötland RÖ-986077Västra Götalandsregionen ALFGBG-971618Vetenskapsrådet 2021-0097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic wounds and severe skin injuries pose significant clinical challenges, as existing treatments like cultured epidermal autografts and tissue engineering strategies fail to regenerate functional dermal tissue effectively. These methods often result in scarring due to poor tissue integration, low cell density, and limited extracellular matrix (ECM) production. Conventional skin tissue engineering relies on time-intensive cell expansion, producing constructs that lack the complexity of native dermal structures. Here, a bioprintable biphasic granular hydrogel bioink (µInk) based on cell-laden porous gelatin microcarriers (PGMs) is presented, enabling fabrication of ultra-high cell density constructs that promote ECM production for dermal regeneration in vitro and in vivo. Primary human dermal fibroblasts are cultured and expanded on PGMs in a bioreactor prior µInk formulation. The cell-laden PGMs are cross-linked via copper-free click chemistry, creating a shear-thinning granular bioink. The µInk is 3D bioprinted into structurally stable constructs with high cell viability. In vivo, the bioprinted constructs supported neovascularization, hydrogel remodeling, and tissue integration over 28 days. Cells maintained their tissue-specific phenotype, proliferated, and produced dermal ECM post-transplantation. The µInk offers a promising approach to generating high cell-density constructs for scar-free wound healing and for advancing complex tissue reconstruction.

Indexed as

BioprintingDermisRegenerationTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsExtracellular MatrixFibroblastsGelatinHumansHydrogelsInkMicePrinting, Three-DimensionalSkinGelatinHydrogels3D bioprintinggranular bioinkhyaluronanporous gelatin microcarrierswound healing

Identifiers

PMID40509628
PMCPMC12365623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.