Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40509617›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of social psychology2025

Where you live matters more than who you know: Context-level contact as a stronger predictor of post-war reconciliation than individual-level contact.

Sabina Čehajić-Clancy, Clemens Lindner, Pascal Gelfort, Julia Elad-Strenger, Thomas Kessler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of social psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sabina Čehajić-ClancyDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6822-843X
Clemens LindnerDepartment of Social Psychology, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Pascal GelfortDepartment of Social Psychology, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8796-1202
Julia Elad-StrengerDepartment of Political Studies, Bar Ilan University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Thomas KesslerDepartment of Social Psychology, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.

Funding

Swedish Research Council 2020-01674
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intergroup contact theory and research argue and demonstrate that intergroup relations, even in post-war societies, could be improved by individuals' positive contact experiences with outgroup members. This study extends this argument by investigating whether post-war reconciliation is determined by the amount and quality of individuals' personal contact experiences with members of former adversary groups (individual-level contact) and/or by the amount and quality of contact that occurs within the context in which they live (context-level contact). Using multilevel analyses among large representative youth samples from ethnic majorities (N = 2758) and minorities (N = 1751) nested across 40 administrative regions in five post-war countries (Bosnia and Herzegovina; North Macedonia; Kosova; Montenegro; Serbia), we provide substantive evidence that context-level contact is a stronger determinant of reconciliation, surpassing the influence of individual-level contact. Evidence from this research demonstrates the critical influence of the social context, particularly the amount and quality of intergroup contact that occurs within individuals' immediate surroundings, on post-war reconciliation, and provides important guidelines for policies and interventions fostering positive intergroup relations.

Indexed as

Group ProcessesInterpersonal RelationsAdolescentAdultBosnia and HerzegovinaEthnicityFemaleHumansMaleMinority GroupsYoung Adultconflict resolutionintergroup contactintergroup relationsreconciliationsocial context

Identifiers

PMID40509617
PMCPMC12163302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.