ArticlePlant communications2025
GPS: Harnessing data fusion strategies to improve the accuracy of machine learning-based genomic and phenotypic selection.
Article in Plant communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering climate-resilient horticultural crops: advances in transcriptional regulation, genome editing, and synthetic networks.Horticulture research · 2026Article
- Harnessing artificial intelligence in plant breeding: innovations in digital phenotyping and breeding methodologies.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Review
- Design and Testing of Root-Specific Synthetic Promoters by Machine Learning.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Towards smart agriculture: AI-driven prediction of key genes for revolutionizing crop breeding.Planta · 2025Review
- Research hotspots and frontiers of application of mass spectrometry breath test in respiratory diseases.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic selection (GS) and phenotypic selection (PS) are widely used for accelerating plant breeding. However, the accuracy, robustness, and transferability of these two selection methods are underexplored, especially when addressing complex traits. In this study, we introduce a novel data fusion framework, GPS (genomic and phenotypic selection), designed to enhance predictive performance by integrating genomic and phenotypic data through three distinct fusion strategies: data fusion, feature fusion, and result fusion. The GPS framework was rigorously tested using an extensive suite of models, including statistical approaches (GBLUP and BayesB), machine learning models (Lasso, RF, SVM, XGBoost, and LightGBM), a deep learning method (DNNGP), and a recent phenotype-assisted prediction model (MAK). These models were applied to large datasets from four crop species, maize, soybean, rice, and wheat, demonstrating the versatility and robustness of the framework. Our results indicated that: (1) data fusion achieved the highest accuracy compared with the feature fusion and result fusion strategies. The top-performing data fusion model (Lasso_D) improved the selection accuracy by 53.4% compared to the best GS model (LightGBM) and by 18.7% compared to the best PS model (Lasso). (2) Lasso_D exhibited exceptional robustness, achieving high predictive accuracy even with a sample size as small as 200 and demonstrating resilience to single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) density variations, underscoring its adaptability to diverse data conditions. Moreover, the model's accuracy improved with the number of auxiliary traits and their correlation strength with target traits, further highlighting its adaptability to complex trait prediction. (3) Lasso_D demonstrated broad transferability, with substantial improvements in predictive accuracy when incorporating multi-environmental data. This enhancement resulted in only a 0.3% reduction in accuracy compared to predictions generated using data from the same environment, affirming the model's reliability in cross-environmental scenarios. This study provides groundbreaking insights, pushing the boundaries of predictive accuracy, robustness, and transferability in trait prediction. These findings represent a significant contribution to plant science, plant breeding, and the broader interdisciplinary fields of statistics and artificial intelligence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.