ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Numerical Investigation of Conventional and Ultrasound-Assisted Aqueous Extraction of Caffeine from Whole Green Robusta Coffee Beans: Extraction Enhancement via Changing of Extraction Water.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Insights into Caffeine Stacking, Partitioning, and Organization in DPPC Lipid Bilayers from Microseconds-Long Molecular Dynamics Simulations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Unlocking the Quality Potential of Liberoid Coffee: Advances in Composition, Processing, and Microbial Fermentation.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To enhance the low-efficiency but potentially health and environmentally friendly aqueous decaffeination process, ultrasound-assisted aqueous extraction (UAAE) has recently been proposed. A novel concept of intermittent extraction water change to further enhance UAAE has also been mentioned, but not yet studied in detail. For this reason, a mathematical model that can be used to predict the concentration evolutions of caffeine during UAAE and conventional aqueous extraction (CAE) of whole green robusta coffee beans is herein proposed. The model consists of terms representing transient intra-bean caffeine and water diffusion as well as molar fluxes of caffeine and water on the bean surface. After validation, the model was used to investigate the effects of extraction temperature, bean-to-water mass ratio and frequency of extraction water change on caffeine concentration evolutions. Simulation results show that UAAE exhibits around 10% higher caffeine removal rates than CAE at all investigated conditions. Extraction temperature of 70 °C, bean-to-water ratio of 1:3, and extraction water change at every 1 h interval are noted as the most appropriate conditions for UAAE. The required extraction durations of UAAE under these conditions are 13 h and 24 h to meet the US and European Union standards, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.