Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40509427›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

The Effect of Different Processing Methods on Metabolite Profiles by Comparative Metabolomics in Kernels and Sprouted Seeds of Foxtail Millet.

Lingda Han, Qi Li, Xiaowen Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lingda HanCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Jinzhong 030801, China.
Qi LiCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Jinzhong 030801, China.ORCID 0009-0009-9040-5039
Xiaowen WangCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Jinzhong 030801, China.

Funding

The College Students Innovation Training Program of Shanxi Agricultural University 202410113113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foxtail millet attracts much attention for its rich nutrients and health benefits. However, ultra-polishing has greatly reduced its nutrition. Germination can enhance nutrition value. Nevertheless, knowledge of nutrient changes in kernels and sprouted grains under different polishing methods and at different germination stages is limited. Here, comparative metabolomics was used to detect metabolite changes in differently polished millets (Manually Polished Millet, MPM; Ultra-Polished Millet, UPM; Manually Ultra-Polished Millet, MUPM) and in sprouted grains with hot air drying (HAD) and freeze-drying (FD) at different germination times. Compared to whole grains, MPM, UPM, and MUPM had 306 to 720 down-regulated metabolites, reducing most antioxidants, essential amino acids, fatty acids, and vitamins in whole grains. For sprouted grains, metabolic activities were comprehensively activated. The early stages accumulated basic nutrients such as free and functional amino acids, small sugars, and essential fatty acids. The 16 h stage increased secondary antioxidant metabolites like flavonoids, and the 24 h germination generated more functional components such as sulfur-containing metabolites. More basic nutrients were preserved by FD in comparison to the reduced basic nutrients and increased antioxidant accumulation associated with HAD. This work systematically characterizes the metabolite changes in polished millets and sprouted grains, providing a reference for developing functional millet products.

Indexed as

freeze-dryinggerminationhot air dryingmilletnutrients

Identifiers

PMID40509427
PMCPMC12154249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.