ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Review on 3D Printing Filaments Used in Fused Deposition Modeling Method for Dermatological Preparations.
Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Promise of 3D Biomaterial Bioprinting for Wound-Healing and Skin Tissue Restoration.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Low Phase Noise, Dual-Frequency Pierce MEMS Oscillators with Direct Print Additively Manufactured Amplifier Circuits.Micromachines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional printing, particularly Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), has revolutionized dermatological drug delivery by offering the ability to create personalized and precise drug formulations. This technology enables the design of customized drug delivery systems using a variety of polymers, such as Polylactic Acid (PLA), Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA), Polyethylene Glycol (PEG), and Polycaprolactone (PCL), each with unique properties that enhance drug release, patient compliance, and treatment efficacy. This review analyzes these polymers in terms of their advantages, limitations, and suitability for dermatological applications. The ability to tailor these materials offers significant potential in overcoming treatment regimens. Additionally, the customization of three-dimensional-printed drug delivery systems provides a platform for creating patient-specific solutions that are more effective and adaptable to individual needs. Despite challenges such as moisture sensitivity and mechanical brittleness, the potential of FDM technology to improve dermatological treatments remains promising. The future of three-dimensional printing in dermatology lies in the integration of optimized materials and advanced printing techniques, which could further enhance patient-specific care and broaden the clinical applicability of these technologies in the pharmaceutical and biomedical sectors. By addressing these limitations and expanding material choices, FDM-based drug delivery systems have the potential to revolutionize the management of dermatological conditions, offering improved therapeutic outcomes and quality of life for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.