ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
SDGTrack: A Multi-Target Tracking Method for Pigs in Multiple Farming Scenarios.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unlocking the potential of computer vision in precision pig farming: a call for a collaborative data and AI models platform.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In pig farming, multi-object tracking (MOT) algorithms are effective tools for identifying individual pigs and monitoring their health, which enhances management efficiency and intelligence. However, due to the considerable variation in breeding environments across different pig farms, existing models often struggle to perform well in unfamiliar settings. To enhance the model's generalization in diverse tracking scenarios, we have innovatively proposed the SDGTrack method. This method improves tracking performance across various farming environments by enhancing the model's adaptability to different domains and integrating an optimized tracking strategy, significantly increasing the generalization of group pig tracking technology across different scenarios. To comprehensively evaluate the potential of the SDGTrack method, we constructed a multi-scenario dataset that includes both public and private data, spanning ten distinct pig farming environments. We only used a portion of the daytime scenes as the training set, while the remaining daytime and nighttime scenes were used as the validation set for evaluation. The experimental results demonstrate that SDGTrack achieved a MOTA score of 80.9%, an IDSW of 24, and an IDF1 score of 85.1% across various scenarios. Compared to the original CSTrack method, SDGTrack improved the MOTA and IDF1 scores by 16.7% and 33.3%, respectively, while significantly reducing the number of ID switches by 94.6%. These findings indicate that SDGTrack offers robust tracking capabilities in previously unseen farming environments, providing a strong technical foundation for monitoring pigs in different settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.