Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40508991›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Stoicism or Defeat? The Psychological Impact of the Kiln Environment on Working Donkeys and Mules.

Katy Taylor, Anna Harrison, Theodora Capaldo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katy TaylorIndependent Researcher, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9445-1838
Anna HarrisonIndependent Researcher, Exeter, UK.
Theodora CapaldoAmerican Fund for Alternatives to Animal Research, Georgetown, MA 01833, USA.

Funding

American Fund for Alternatives to Animal Research n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most problematic situations for the estimated 60 million working donkeys and mules across the world is within the brick kiln environment. In countries such as Egypt, Nepal, India and Pakistan, donkeys and mules carry dried bricks into small kilns either by pulling carts or carrying loaded packs. The health and welfare problems of this environment are well documented: they may carry excessive loads; work long hours, have difficulties accessing food, water and rest options; and can frequently suffer untreated illnesses including dental problems, lameness and open wounds from poorly fitting harnesses and aggressive handlers. The impact of this environment on their mental health has been largely overlooked. We use a behavioral comparative analogy approach, comparing the clinical signs and risk factors associated with learned helplessness, depression and complex post-traumatic stress disorder (cPTSD) in humans and laboratory studies in other animals with evidence from the veterinary literature. Based on an analysis of seven quantitative veterinary studies that have evaluated the health and behavior of kiln donkeys and mules, we argue that their behavior may be consistent with learned helplessness, depression and/or cPTSD. Furthermore, the kiln environment contains many of the key environmental risk factors associated with the development of these disorders. And, because of certain behavioral differences from horses, donkeys and mules are at greater risk of their physical and mental health being overlooked. This finding, adding to the wealth of evidence for their poor health, should further strengthen efforts to replace their use in the kiln environment.

Indexed as

brick kilndepressiondonkeylearned helplessnessmulesPTSDwelfare

Identifiers

PMID40508991
PMCPMC12153751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.