Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40508966›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Unpacking Young Adults' Fact-Checking Intent on Oral Health Misinformation: Parallel Mediating Roles of Need for Cognition and Perceived Seriousness-A Cross-Sectional Study.

Donghwa Chung, Yongjun Zhang, Jiaqi Wang, Yanfang Meng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Donghwa ChungSchool of Journalism and Communication, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China.
Yongjun ZhangSchool of Journalism and Communication, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China.
Jiaqi WangSchool of Journalism and Communication, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China.
Yanfang MengSchool of Journalism and Communication, Beijing Institute of Graphic Communication, Beijing 102699, China.

Funding

2024 Center for China and Foreign Humanities Exchanges, the Ministry of Education, and the Institute for China and Foreign Humanities Exchanges in the Culture and Tourism Industry CCIPEWHLY2024001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOral health misinformation has increasingly proliferated across social media platforms in China, prompting rising concerns about the accuracy of health-related content. Fact-checking intent has been identified as a key strategy for mitigating the spread of such misinformation. However, empirical research on the psychological factors shaping engagement in fact-checking behaviors remains limited.

objectivesThis study aims to examine the association between misinformation recognition and fact-checking intent among Chinese young adults (aged 18-36).

methodsGuided by status quo bias theory, this study integrates psychological constructs into its theoretical framework. A stimulus-based online survey was conducted, yielding 452 valid responses. Direct, mediated, and serial mediation hypotheses were tested using SPSS 26.0 and Jamovi 2.6.24.

resultsThe findings indicate a significant positive relationship between misinformation recognition and fact-checking intent. A parallel mediation model involving need for cognition and perceived seriousness was supported, clarifying the psychological mechanisms underlying this relationship.

conclusionsThis study contributes valuable empirical evidence to the understanding of fact-checking intent among Chinese young adults in the context of oral health misinformation. The findings offer practical implications for developing targeted interventions to increase misinformation awareness and promote active engagement in fact-checking behaviors.

Indexed as

fact-checking intentoral health misinformationstatus quo bias theorysurveyyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID40508966
PMCPMC12155137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.