ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Neonatal Tracheal Intubation in the NICU: A Literature Review.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Validation status of definitive airway management simulators: a systematic review.British journal of anaesthesia · 2026Pooled it
- Periviable antenatal care, labor and delivery, and initial resuscitation: Some chores to get done before you start.Pediatric research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This literature review explores factors influencing neonatal ICU intubation success, compares outcomes across settings, and identifies strategies to improve outcomes in this vulnerable population. A PubMed search was conducted using relevant keywords related to neonatal tracheal intubation. Studies published in English from 2000 to 2024 were included, with additional sources identified through manual bibliography reviews. Extracted findings were qualitatively synthesized by themes such as procedural outcomes, intubation setting, and provider training level. Nearly half of all neonatal tracheal intubations (TIs) are unsuccessful, with the rate of tracheal intubation adverse events (TIAEs) increasing with each additional attempt. First-pass success rates (FPSRs) correlate with provider experience, with attending physicians achieving the highest rates across all settings. Video laryngoscopy is associated with improved outcomes, particularly in neonates with difficult airways; however, direct laryngoscopy (DL) remains more commonly used. Premedication has been shown to reduce TIAEs and enhance FPSR, yet it remains underutilized in clinical practice. Standardized protocols, improved simulation-based training, and multidisciplinary strategies are essential to reduce complications. Future research should prioritize optimizing airway management and evaluating the impact of otorhinolaryngologist involvement, especially in difficult airway cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.