Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40508798›Full record

ArticlePolymers2025

Effect of Processing Parameters on the Printability and Mechano-Biological Properties of Polycaprolactone-Bioactive Glass Composites for 3D-Printed Scaffold Fabrication.

José I Contreras Raggio, Miguel Pardo, Pablo Núñez, Carola Millán, Gilberto Siqueira, Humberto Palza, Juan F Vivanco, Ameet K Aiyangar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

José I Contreras RaggioFacultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Padre Hurtado 750, Viña del Mar 2520000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-7457-9559
Miguel PardoFacultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Padre Hurtado 750, Viña del Mar 2520000, Chile.
Pablo NúñezFacultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Padre Hurtado 750, Viña del Mar 2520000, Chile.
Carola MillánFacultad de Artes Liberales, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Padre Hurtado 750, Viña del Mar 2520000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-6567-8774
Gilberto SiqueiraLaboratory for Cellulose & Wood Materials, EMPA, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Material Science and Technology, Überlandstrasse 129, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Humberto PalzaDepartamento de Ingeniería Química y Biotecnología, Facultad de Ciencias Físicas y Matemáticas, Universidad de Chile, Beauchef 851, Santiago 8370456, Chile.
Juan F VivancoFacultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Padre Hurtado 750, Viña del Mar 2520000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-2659-368X
Ameet K AiyangarLaboratories for Mechanical Systems Engineering, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (EMPA), Überlandstrasse 129, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland.

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo 1231708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct ink writing (DIW) is an attractive, extrusion-based, additive manufacturing method for fabricating scaffold structures with controlled porosity using custom composite inks. Polycaprolactone-bioactive glass (PCL-BG) inks have gained attention for bone applications, but optimizing the formulation and fabrication of PCL-BG-based inks for improved printability and desired mechano-biological properties remains a challenge. This study employs a two-step design to systematically evaluate the effect of three factors in terms of PCL-BG composite printability and mechano-biological properties: ink preparation (acetone or dichloromethane (DCM) as the solvent, and mechanical compounding), the extrusion temperature (90 °C, 110 °C, and 130 °C), and the BG content (0%, 10%, and 20% BG). Pure PCL was used as the control. Rheological, calorimetric, and thermo-gravimetric analyses were conducted before printing. Cylindrical scaffolds and solid wells were printed to evaluate the printability, mechanical properties, and cytocompatibility. The scaffold porosity and pore size were carefully examined. Mechanical tests demonstrated that composite formulations with added BG and higher printing temperatures increased the elastic modulus and yield strength. However, PCL-DCM-BG combinations exhibited increased brittleness with higher BG content. Despite concerns about the toxic solvent DCM, the cytocompatibility was comparable to pure PCL for all ink preparation methods. The results suggest that the interaction between the ink preparation solvent, the BG content, and the printing temperature is critical for material design and fabrication planning in bone tissue engineering applications, providing insights into optimizing PCL-BG composite ink formulations for 3D printing in bone tissue engineering.

Indexed as

additive manufacturingbioactive glassbone scaffoldscomposite bio-scaffoldscomposite ink characterizationdirect ink writingextrusion-based 3D printingPCL

Identifiers

PMID40508798
PMCPMC12158094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.