ArticlePolymers2025
Experimental Study and ANN Development for Modeling Tensile and Surface Quality of Fiber-Reinforced Nylon Composites.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of gyroid lattice relative density on wear and mechanical performance of 3D printed TPU and flexible nylon for footwear.iScience · 2026Article
- Frequency-Dependent Effects of Material Extrusion Parameters on the Storage Modulus and Loss Factor of PETG.Polymers · 2026Article
- Tri-domain prediction and optimization of nanocomposite polymers for high-performance 3D printing.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The Role of Residual Lignin in Microfibrillated Cellulose in Properties of Polylactic Acid Biocomposites.Polymers · 2026Article
- Machine Learning for Predicting Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Polymers from Process Parameters: A Review.Polymers · 2026Review
- Article
- Hybrid Experimental-Machine Learning Study on the Mechanical Behavior of Polymer Composite Structures Fabricated via FDM.Polymers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) is gaining widespread adoption in the manufacturing industry due to its capability to fabricate intricate and high-performance components. In parallel, the increasing emphasis on functional materials in AM has highlighted the critical need for accurate prediction of the mechanical behavior of composite systems. This study experimentally investigates the tensile strength and surface quality of carbon fiber-reinforced nylon composites (PA12-CF) fabricated via fused deposition modeling (FDM) and models their behavior using artificial neural networks (ANNs). A Taguchi L27 orthogonal array was employed to design experiments involving five critical printing parameters: layer thickness (100, 200, and 300 µm), infill pattern (gyroid, honeycomb, and triangles), nozzle temperature (250, 270, and 290 °C), printing speed (50, 100, and 150 mm/s), and infill density (30, 60, and 90%). An analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that the infill density had the most significant influence on the resulting tensile strength, contributing 53.47% of the variation, with the strength increasing substantially at higher densities. In contrast, the layer thickness was the dominant factor in determining surface roughness, accounting for 53.84% of the variation, with thinner layers yielding smoother surfaces. Mechanistically, a higher infill density enhances the internal structural integrity of the parts, leading to an improved load-bearing capacity, while thinner layers improve the interlayer adhesion and surface finish. The highest tensile strength achieved was 69.65 MPa, and the lowest surface roughness recorded was 9.18 µm. An ANN model was developed to predict both the tensile strength and surface roughness based on the input parameters. Its performance was compared with that of three other machine learning (ML) algorithms: support vector regression (SVR), random forest regression (RFR), and XGBoost. The ANN model exhibited superior predictive accuracy, with a coefficient of determination (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.