ArticlePolymers2025
Antioxidant Biocomposite Films Based on Grape Stalk Lignocellulosic Fractions and Biodegradable Polyesters.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Grape stalk (GS) from winemaking is a waste rich in antioxidant compounds that can be valorized to obtain active food packaging materials. Biocomposite films of poly (butylene succinate) (PBS) and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)-co-hydroxyvalerate (PHBV) with 10% of GS particles, previously submitted or not to subcritical water extraction at 170 °C and 180 °C, were obtained by melt blending and characterized. The fibres were better integrated in the PHBV matrix than in PBS, while other molecular compounds from the fillers were released to the polymer matrix, allowing for their antioxidant action. Fillers promoted the stiffness of PBS films (11-44%), reducing their resistance to break and extensibility by 25%, without significant changes in polymer crystallinity or thermal stability. However, this reduced the crystallinity (13%) and thermal stability of PHBV films, decreasing their rigidity (55%). All fibres promoted the oxygen barrier capacity in composites (by about 20-35% for PBS and PHBV, respectively) while also providing them with UV light blocking effects. This barrier effect enhanced the ability of the films to preserve sunflower oil against oxidation, while in PHBV composites, the migration of antioxidant compounds was also detected. No remarkable differences in the effects of the different GS fillers on the properties of composites were detected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.