ArticlePolymers2025
Experimental Study of Comprehensive Performance Analysis Regarding the Dynamical/Mechanical Aspects of 3D-Printed UAV Propellers and Sound Footprint.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dimensional Fidelity and Slicer Mass Prediction Bias in FFF-Printed UAV Micro-Frames: A Material-Dependent Comparative Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study evaluates the viability of fabricating unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) propellers using fused filament fabrication (FFF), with an emphasis on low-cost, desktop-scale production. The study's backdrop is the recent adoption of UAVs and advancements in additive manufacturing. While the scope targets accessibility for individual and small-scale users, the results have broader implications for scalable UAV propulsion systems. The research was conducted within an experimental UAV development framework aimed at optimizing propeller performance through strategic material selection, geometrical design optimization, and additive manufacturing processes. Six propeller variants were manufactured using widely available thermoplastic polymers, including polyethylene terephthalate glycol-modified (PETG) and thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU), as well as photopolymer-based propellers fabricated using vat photopolymerization, also known as digital light processing (DLP). Mechanical and aerodynamic characterizations were performed to assess the structural integrity, flexibility, and performance of each material under dynamic conditions. Two blade configurations, a toroidal propeller with anticipated aerodynamic advantages and a conventional tri-blade propeller (Gemfan 51466-3)-were comparatively analyzed. The primary contribution of this work is the systematic evaluation of performance metrics such as thrust generation, acoustic signature, mechanical strength, and thermal stress imposed on the electrical motor, thereby establishing a benchmark for polymer-based propeller fabrication via additive manufacturing. The findings underscore the potential of polymeric materials and layer-based manufacturing techniques in advancing the design and production of UAV propulsion components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.