Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40508702›Full record

ReviewPolymers2025

Overview and Evaluation of Chemicals and Methods for Flame Retardancy in Glued Laminated Wood Systems.

Ewelina Depczynska, Izabela Burawska

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ewelina DepczynskaPaged LabTech, Kwiatowa 1, 12-200 Pisz, Poland.
Izabela BurawskaDepartment of Technology and Entrepreneurship in Wood Industry, Institute of Wood Sciences and Furniture, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, 159 Nowoursynowska St., 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8636-5622

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the development of wooden construction as an ecological alternative to brick construction with a high carbon footprint, there is increasing interest in materials such as plywood and LVL (Laminated Veneer Lumber). These engineered wood products have many advantages compared to wood, such as a more uniform distribution of bending, shear, tensile, and compressive strength. However, they require improvements in fire and biological resistance. The flammability of wood and wood composites is a challenge that will allow these materials to stand out as structural or finishing materials. During combustion, toxic gases may be released, which can be harmful to people and the environment. Therefore, it is crucial to clarify whether fire-resistant wood materials are truly resistant to fire and non-toxic in fire conditions. On the other hand, flame retardants should not reduce the mechanical parameters of panels. This work analyses the current requirements (standards) regarding plywood intended for construction and the existing flame retardants for plywood and LVL based on the latest reports in the literature. We then propose an original method for evaluating future chemicals. Additionally, methods for assessing the flame retardancy of plywood and LVL based on the latest reports in the literature are described, and an original method for assessing flame retardancy methods is proposed.

Indexed as

fire resistanceflame retardantLVLplywoodwooden construction

Identifiers

PMID40508702
PMCPMC12158134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.