Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40508700›Full record

ReviewPolymers2025

Nanofiber-Based Innovations in Energy Storage Systems.

Iva Rezić Meštrović, Maja Somogyi Škoc

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Engineering 3D Heterostructured NiCoNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Iva Rezić MeštrovićDepartment of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Textile Technology, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-1531-776X
Maja Somogyi ŠkocDepartment of Materials, Fibers and Textile Testing, Faculty of Textile Technology, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-8026-8952

Funding

Croatian Science Foundation IP-2024-05-4339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanofibers have emerged as transformative materials in the field of energy storage, offering unique physicochemical properties such as high surface area, porosity, and tunable morphology. Recent advancements have also introduced genetically modified fibers-engineered at the biological level to produce functionalized nanostructures with customizable properties. These bioengineered nanofibers add a sustainable and potentially self-healing component to energy storage materials. This paper reviews key applications of conventional and genetically modified nanofibers in lithium-ion and sodium-ion batteries, supercapacitors, hybrid systems, and flexible energy storage with a focus on how genetic and molecular engineering of fibrous materials enables new capabilities in ion transport, electrode architecture, and device longevity. Together, these advances contribute to the development of next-generation energy storage systems with enhanced performance, biocompatibility, and sustainability. This review therefore critically examines the current state, advantages, and limitations of both synthetic and biopolymer-based materials in energy storage applications. It discusses recent technological innovations, such as polymer-nanoparticle composites, functionalized polymer matrices, and next-generation polymer electrolytes. Future research should prioritize enhancing conductivity, improving scalability, and reducing environmental impact, ensuring that polymer-based materials contribute to the development of more efficient and sustainable energy storage technologies.

Indexed as

energy storagefibers for energy storagegenetically modified fibersnet zero energysustainable solutions

Identifiers

PMID40508700
PMCPMC12157270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.