ArticlePolymers2025
Unraveling the Print-Structure-Property Relationships in the FFF of PEEK: A Critical Assessment of Print Parameters.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Additive Manufacturing of High-Performance Polymers for Extreme Environments.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Enhancing the Performance of FFF-Printed Parts: A Review of Reinforcement and Modification Strategies for Thermoplastic Polymers.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Poly-ether ether ketone (PEEK) is a high-performance thermoplastic known for its excellent mechanical properties, making it relevant for aerospace and medical applications. Additive manufacturing (AM) represents a critical step towards integrating PEEK into these sectors, particularly for complex geometries and custom parts. However, the mechanical properties achieved through AM have not yet reached those obtained via conventional techniques. Recent studies have sought to optimize the printing parameters to bridge this gap, but their findings remain inconsistent and difficult to generalize-suggesting a strong dependence on the experimental conditions. This is partly due to the Fused Filament Fabrication of PEEK being an emerging technology, with many studies relying on in-house built printers. Moreover, the underlying microstructural mechanisms governing its performance have rarely been explored in depth. In this work, we establish clear processing-structure-property relationships by integrating a rigorous DoE approach with comprehensive microstructural characterization. Our results highlight the dominant role of the processing environment near the glass transition temperature in promoting chain mobility, enhancing the amorphous phase ordering, and improving the mechanical performance: crystallinity alone does not fully explain the mechanical behavior of additively manufactured PEEK. Further, higher nozzle temperatures lower the porosity and increase the filament bonding, while faster printing speeds reduce the crystallinity and increase the porosity, negatively affecting the mechanical integrity. The results of this study are generalizable to any FFF printer of PEEK. Other materials or printing technologies are out of the scope of this work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.