ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
The Use of Cyanoacrylate and Glubran in Dentistry: A Review of Clinical Applications and Outcomes.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digitally Guided Frontal Sinus Fracture Fixation: A Point-of-Care "In-House" Biomodel Protocol with Cyanoacrylate-Assisted Fragment Stabilization.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- In-vitro evaluation of shear bond strength and bond-failure of isoamyl cyanoacrylate-resin adhesive ratios for bonding 3D-Printed denture bases and teeth.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cyanoacrylate-based adhesives have gained increasing attention in dentistry for their rapid polymerization, biocompatibility, and antimicrobial activity. This review analyzes the clinical use of cyanoacrylate adhesives-particularly the Glubran II formulation-in dental procedures, including wound closure, tissue management, and bleeding control. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for studies published between 2000 and 2024, using specific inclusion criteria (clinical and in vitro studies focusing on dental applications of cyanoacrylates) and exclusion criteria (non-dental uses, insufficient data). The findings indicate that compared to traditional sutures, cyanoacrylates, especially n-butyl and octyl derivatives, significantly reduce operative time, postoperative pain, and infection rates. However, differences among formulations-such as degradation rate and cytotoxicity-require further exploration. Glubran II, in particular, shows promising results in hemostasis and wound stability. This review highlights the potential of cyanoacrylate adhesives as effective, minimally invasive alternatives in dental surgery and underlines the need for standardized protocols and long-term comparative studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.