ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Micro-CT Assessment of Internal and External Void Formation in Class II Restorations of Primary Molars Using Bulk-Fill Composites.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Micro-Computed Tomography Assessment of Voids and Volume Changes in Bulk-Fill Restoration with Stamp Technique.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the formation of internal and external voids in class II restorations of primary molars using bulk-fill composites with different viscosities through micro-CT analysis. Standardized class II cavities were prepared on 50 extracted intact primary molars. The teeth were restored with bulk-fill materials of varying viscosity: SDR, Tetric EvoCeram bulk-fill, Viscalor bulk, Cention forte, and a control group (Dyract XP). They were then scanned using a computed microtomograph. The volumes of the internal and external voids were quantified and expressed as percentages (%) of the total restoration volume. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey's test (α = 0.05). The detected external and internal voids ranged from 0.19% to 0.62%. The data indicated no significant difference in the formation of external voids among the various bulk-fill materials or the control group (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.