Engineering Characteristics of Dredged Sediment Solidified by MSWI FA and Cement Under Different Curing Conditions.

Shucheng Zhang, Haoqing Xu, Xinmiao Shi, Wenyang Zhang, Jinyuan Xu

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shucheng ZhangJiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Geoenvironmental Disaster Prevention and Remediation, School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212100, China.

Haoqing XuJiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Geoenvironmental Disaster Prevention and Remediation, School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212100, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2555-3704

Xinmiao ShiCollege of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210024, China.ORCID 0009-0006-4332-6459

Wenyang ZhangJiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Geoenvironmental Disaster Prevention and Remediation, School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212100, China.

Jinyuan XuCollege of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210024, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional landfill cover materials have low strength and poor dry-wet durability. Municipal solid waste incineration fly ash (MSWI FA) can be used to partially replace cement solidification dredging sediment (DS). This article investigates the possibility of using MSWI FA and ordinary Portland cement (OPC) composite cured DS as a covering material. The mechanical properties, permeability, and wet-dry durability of the cured system were investigated under the conditions of MSWI FA content ranging from 0% to 60% and OPC content ranging from 10% to 15%. The microscopic mechanism was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction. The results showed that when the OPC and MSWI FA contents were 15% and 20%, respectively, the comprehensive performance of the cured specimens was best after 28 days of natural curing. The unconfined compressive strength reached 1993.9 kPa, and the permeability coefficient decreased to below 1 × 10

Indexed as

curing conditionsdredged sedimentlandfill cover materialsmechanical propertiesMSWI FAwaste utilization

Identifiers

PMID40508616

DOI10.3390/ma18112622

PMCPMC12156446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.