ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Impact of Structural Stiffness on Vibration Periods of Concrete Buildings: A Systematic Review.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Research on the relationship between structural characteristics and vibration periods in concrete buildings is crucial to ensure the safety and efficiency of these structures, especially in earthquake-prone areas. This article aims to analyze and compare the impact of structural stiffness of different elements, such as beams, columns and shear walls, on vibration periods, through a systematic review of existing models and formulas in the literature, identifying their applications and limitations. The methodology used consists of a systematic review that integrates recent and relevant studies, providing a solid basis for analysis. The results indicate that an increase in the stiffness of structural elements can reduce vibration periods by 20-50%, implying a faster response to external forces. Even in low-rise buildings, the fundamental period can be reduced by 53% to 70%. These findings are significant for the design and construction of concrete buildings, as they suggest that incorporating rigid structural elements can improve seismic resistance and reduce the risk of damage. In addition, the research contributes to the field of structural dynamics by highlighting the need to integrate different methods of analysis and evaluation. It is recommended that engineers and architects adopt innovative approaches, such as the use of emerging technologies and monitoring methods, to improve damage detection and optimize structural design. Finally, it identifies areas where more research is required, suggesting that future studies should explore the interaction between structural characteristics and environmental conditions for a more complete understanding of the vibrational behavior of buildings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.