ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Study on the Properties of Solidified Silt Based on Microbially Stimulated Recycled Hardened Cement Powder.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The carbon emissions from the cement industry account for approximately 8% of global carbon emissions, which exerts significant pressure on the environment. In this paper, the microbial-induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP) technology was introduced into the carbonization modification research of recycled hardened cement powder (RHCP), and the carbon sequestration performance of RHCP under different pressures was studied. The physicochemical properties of the carbonated products were characterized by microscopic testing methods, and the carbon sequestration mechanism under different pressures was obtained. Subsequently, carbonated RHCP (C-RHCP) was tested as a partial cement substitute for solidified sludge to evaluate its mechanical and durability properties. The results show that when the pressures were 0.3 and 0.5 MPa, the carbon sequestration capacity of RHCP was relatively good, reaching 59.14 and 59.82 g/kg, respectively. Since the carbon sequestration amounts under the two pressures were similar, and considering the energy consumption, in this study, a reaction pressure of 0.3 MPa was selected to prepare C-RHCP. Compared with pure cement, the 28-day unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of the sludge cured with 30% C-RHCP increased by 12.08%. The water stability coefficient of the solidified sludge in the C-RHCP group was greater than 1 after soaking for 7, 14, and 21 days, while the water stability coefficient of the cement group decreased to 0.92 at 14 days. After 20 freeze-thaw cycles, the mass losses of the cement group, the RHCP group, and the C-RHCP group were 31.43%, 38.99%, and 33.09%, respectively. This research not only provides an environmentally friendly strategy for the resource utilization of RHCP but also pioneers a new synergistic model that combines microbial mineralization with the modification of industrial solid waste. It demonstrated significant scientific value and engineering application prospects in reducing carbon emissions in the cement industry and promoted sustainable geotechnical engineering practices based on the "waste-waste" principle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.