ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Effect of Waterglass on the Hydration Process of Slag-Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimization of Mix Proportion and Performance Study of Metakaolin-Slag Geopolymer Mortar Based on Orthogonal Experiment.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Geopolymers possess good mechanical properties and durability, and their partial replacement of traditional Portland cement is noteworthy for promoting the development of low-carbon building materials. To clarify the influence mechanism of the mechanical properties of slag-fly ash-based geopolymer mortar, this paper investigated the hydration heat, composition, and morphology of hydration products with various contents and moduli of waterglass. The results showed that the compressive strength of geopolymer mortar increased with increasing waterglass content, and first rose and then fell as the waterglass modulus raised, while its flexural strength increased and then decreased with the growth in both. The compressive and flexural strength of geopolymer mortar with 1.2-modulus waterglass at 20 wt% cured for 28 days were 88.4 MPa and 9.0 MPa, respectively. The hydration temperature and cumulative hydration heat of geopolymer mortar was elevated with the increase in waterglass content, and declined with the rising waterglass modulus. The hydration products of the geopolymer consisted of dense amorphous and flocculent structures wrapped around each other. The microstructure of the geopolymer cured for 3 days was loose when the content of 1.4-modulus waterglass was 5 wt%. The relative areas of the flocculation in the geopolymer cured for 28 days increased while the waterglass modulus was greater than 1.4, forming an interface with the dense amorphous structure generated during the early hydration stage, leading to a decrease in its mechanical properties. Therefore, it is recommended for slag-fly ash geopolymer mortar that the waterglass modulus is between 1.2 and 1.4 and its content is no less than 10 wt% to ensure suitable mechanical properties. This study also provided a referenceable time period for the pouring and operation of the engineering application of slag-fly ash-based geopolymer repair mortar.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.