ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Data-Driven Approach to Derive Equation for Predicting Ultimate Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Beams Without Stirrups.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Shear failure in reinforced concrete (RC) beams is abrupt and brittle, occurs without warning, and leaves no opportunity for internal stress redistribution. Despite the critical need for accurate shear strength assessment, existing methods vary widely across regions, leading to inconsistencies in practice. This study presents a unified shear strength equation for non-prestressed rectangular RC beams without stirrups, developed for simplicity and broad applicability. The model requires only basic geometric and material properties and applies to both shear-slender and non-shear-slender beams. It was formulated using a data-driven approach that combines an extensive experimental database collected up to 2007 with advanced computational techniques, including Artificial Neural Networks, Generative Adversarial Networks, and Bayesian optimization. The proposed equation was evaluated against established shear provisions, such as ACI 318-25 and CSA A23.3-24, and benchmarked with an experimental database. The results show that the model improves prediction accuracy, reduces uncertainty, and provides a more consistent method for shear strength assessment. The robustness of the equation was further confirmed through additional experimental database gathered after 2007, demonstrating strong agreement with test results and lower prediction uncertainty than current code provisions. These findings support the potential adoption of the proposed equation in engineering practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.