Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Yue XuLaboratory of Medicinal Plant Cultivation and Breeding, National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, College of Chinese Medicinal Materials, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China.
Zhiqing WuLaboratory of Medicinal Plant Cultivation and Breeding, National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, College of Chinese Medicinal Materials, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China.ORCID 0009-0002-6594-3192
Yugang GaoLaboratory of Medicinal Plant Cultivation and Breeding, National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, College of Chinese Medicinal Materials, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China.
Pu ZangLaboratory of Medicinal Plant Cultivation and Breeding, National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, College of Chinese Medicinal Materials, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China.
Xinyu YangLaboratory of Medicinal Plant Cultivation and Breeding, National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, College of Chinese Medicinal Materials, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China.
Yan ZhaoLaboratory of Medicinal Plant Cultivation and Breeding, National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, College of Chinese Medicinal Materials, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China.
Qun LiuJiangsu Key Laboratory for the Research and Utilization of Plant Resources, Institute of Botany, Jiangsu Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6828-4973
Funding
Fund of Jiangsu Key Laboratory for the Research and Utilization of Plant Resources JSPKLB202201Jiangsu Institute of Botany Talent Fund JIBTF202201the National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFF1300503-04the Science and Technology Development Program of Jilin Province 20210401093YYthe Science and Technology Development Program of Jilin Province 20220401110YY
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
The degeneration of germplasm is a key factor limiting the yield and quality of
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
GePIF4 Increases the Multi-Flower/Capsule-Bearing Traits and Gastrodin Biosynthesis in · full record | OpenQuestion