ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Do We Know Enough About the Safety Profile of Silver Nanoparticles in Oncology? A Focus on Novel Methods and Approaches.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioengineered Silver Nanoparticles: Next-Generation Biogenic Synthesis Strategies for Precision Biomedical Applications.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Silver Nanoparticles as Anticancer Agents: Mechanisms Insight, Current Studies, and Limitations.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Research progress on the mechanisms of cGAS-STING signaling in immune cell infiltration associated with vascular remodeling.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have emerged as promising agents in cancer diagnostics and/or therapy, demonstrating a lot of possible pharmacological actions. However, understanding the pharmacokinetics and safety profiles of nanoparticles, which is crucial for their clinical application, still raises many questions. Studies indicate that AgNPs can accumulate in tumour tissues, improving drug delivery and specificity. However, their interaction with biological systems necessitates thorough safety evaluations. Classical methods for assessing AgNPs' safety include cytotoxicity assays, genotoxicity tests, and histopathological examinations. However, novel techniques are emerging, such as advanced imaging and biomarker analysis, offering more precise toxicity assessments. Prediction models, including computational simulations and in silico analyses, are being developed to forecast AgNPs' toxicity profiles. These models aim to reduce reliance on animal testing and expedite the evaluation process. To mitigate potential risks associated with nanoparticle-based therapies, strategies such as surface modification, controlled release systems, and targeted delivery are being explored. These methods aim to enhance therapeutic efficacy while minimizing adverse effects. The main aim of this review article is to describe AgNPs from the point of view of their pharmacokinetic/toxicokinetic profile in the light of modern knowledge. Special attention will be given to novel methods for assessing the safety and toxicity profiles of AgNPs, providing insights into their interactions with cancer therapies and their potential clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.