ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Copeptin as a New Blood-Based Marker for Differential Diagnosis in Stroke Patients.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy of blood copeptin level for the prediction of mortality of adult patients with sepsis: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Copeptin as a promising biomarker of cerebrovascular events: A minireview.Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diagnosis in stroke patients is based mainly on clinical and radiological findings; therefore, there is a need for serological markers that can orient the clinician. Copeptin is a new blood marker for diagnosis and prognosis in several neurological conditions, such as ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, and multiple sclerosis. The aim of our study was to highlight the diagnostic value of copeptin in differentiating between stroke subtypes and stroke mimics. We performed a literature review by searching the PubMed and Scopus databases for papers with the following keywords: "stroke AND copeptin AND differential". The PRISMA criteria were used. We identified 29 papers that met the criteria. We analyzed only original research articles, excluding reviews and only including those in English. Some studies did not find any significant differences between cerebral infarction, intracerebral hemorrhage, and subarachnoid hemorrhage, but one study demonstrated significant correlations. All studies agreed that copeptin levels can help in differentiating stroke patients from stroke-free patients. Copeptin levels were correlated with prognostic scales For stroke mimics, copeptin levels were extremely broad and for vestibular disorders; it was shown that a normal level of copeptin excludes stroke. Copeptin is a new blood marker that can help clinicians in the acute neurological field. It may help in diagnosing stroke, in differentiating between stroke subtypes and stroke mimics, and in evaluating the prognosis of these patients, but further studies are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.