Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40508136›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Breeding for Plant Disease Resistance.

Juan Ma, Zeqiang Cheng, Yanyong Cao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Juan MaInstitute of Cereal Crops, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou 450002, China.
Zeqiang ChengInstitute of Cereal Crops, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou 450002, China.
Yanyong CaoInstitute of Cereal Crops, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou 450002, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3334-0610

Funding

Science and Technology Project of Henan Province 252102110245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Harnessing state-of-the-art technologies to improve disease resistance is a critical objective in modern plant breeding. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning and big model (large language model and large multi-modal model), has emerged as a transformative tool to enhance disease detection and omics prediction in plant science. This paper provides a comprehensive review of AI-driven advancements in plant disease detection, highlighting convolutional neural networks and their linked methods and technologies through bibliometric analysis from recent research. We further discuss the groundbreaking potential of large language models and multi-modal models in interpreting complex disease patterns via heterogeneous data. Additionally, we summarize how AI accelerates genomic and phenomic selection by enabling high-throughput analysis of resistance-associated traits, and explore AI's role in harmonizing multi-omics data to predict plant disease-resistant phenotypes. Finally, we propose some challenges and future directions in terms of data, model, and privacy facets. We also provide our perspectives on integrating federated learning with a large language model for plant disease detection and resistance prediction. This review provides a comprehensive guide for integrating AI into plant breeding programs, facilitating the translation of computational advances into disease-resistant crop breeding.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDisease ResistancePlant BreedingPlant DiseasesDeep LearningGenomicsartificial intelligencedeep learninglarge language modelphenomicsphenotypeplant disease

Identifiers

PMID40508136
PMCPMC12154274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.