Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40508090›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Assessing the Viability of Segmental Aneuploid Embryos: A Chromosomal Concordance Study of 175 Human Blastocysts.

En-Hui Cheng, Hui-Hsin Shih, Tsung-Hsien Lee, Pin-Yao Lin, Tzu-Ning Yu, Chun-Chia Huang, Maw-Sheng Lee, Chun-I Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

En-Hui ChengGenetic Diagnosis Laboratory, Lee Women's Hospital, Taichung 40652, Taiwan.
Hui-Hsin ShihGenetic Diagnosis Laboratory, Lee Women's Hospital, Taichung 40652, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-8503-4802
Tsung-Hsien LeeInstitute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 40201, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-8858-0916
Pin-Yao LinPost Baccalaureate Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 40227, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4602-5732
Tzu-Ning YuDivision of Infertility, Lee Women's Hospital, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-9253-7037
Chun-Chia HuangDivision of Infertility, Lee Women's Hospital, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-2649-2384
Maw-Sheng LeeInstitute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 40201, Taiwan.
Chun-I LeeDivision of Infertility, Lee Women's Hospital, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0005-1310-2350

Funding

National Science and Technology Council of Taiwan MOST 106-3114-B-040-001 and NSTC 111-2218-E-040-001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is widely used to select euploid embryos for in vitro fertilization (IVF), but its accuracy in predicting the implantation potential for full segmental aneuploid (Seg-A) embryos remains unclear. In this study, we investigated chromosomal concordance between clinically biopsied trophectoderm (TE) and inner cell mass (ICM) in 175 donated blastocysts, which comprised those clinically diagnosed as euploid (13), Seg-A (36), segmental mosaicism (Seg-M) (60), whole-chromosome aneuploid (Who-A) (52), and whole-chromosome mosaicism (14). Using next-generation sequencing (NGS), we found that TE-ICM concordance rates were higher for euploid (85%) and Who-A (94%) embryos but significantly lower for Seg-A (25%) and Seg-M embryos (33%). For Seg-A, the euploidy rate in the ICM was 19% and the euploidy rate in the ICM was 63% for Seg-M. These low concordance rates may be due to technical and biological artifacts of PGT-A for Seg-A. Despite the significant discordance between TE and ICM, a subset of Seg-A embryos demonstrated euploidy. While clinically diagnosed euploid embryos remain the preferred choice, Seg-A embryos should be considered as having implantation potential. In particular, Seg-A results should be clearly distinguished from Who-A results and not routinely categorically discarded. Further research is required to refine the selection criteria, aided by parental karyotyping or re-biopsy, and to develop more reliable embryo assessment methods to ensure the accurate evaluation of reproductive potential and support shared decision making between doctors and patients.

Indexed as

AneuploidyBlastocystPreimplantation DiagnosisAdultEmbryo ImplantationFemaleFertilization in VitroGenetic TestingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMosaicismPregnancypreimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A)segmental aneuploidy (Seg-A)segmental mosaicism (Seg-M)trophectoderm (TE) biopsy

Identifiers

PMID40508090
PMCPMC12155557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.