Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40508065›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Explainability of Protein Deep Learning Models.

Zahra Fazel, Camila P E de Souza, G Brian Golding, Lucian Ilie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zahra FazelDepartment of Computer Science, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5B7, Canada.
Camila P E de SouzaDepartment of Statistical and Actuarial Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5B7, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4465-5792
G Brian GoldingDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L6S 4K1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7575-0282
Lucian IlieDepartment of Computer Science, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5B7, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1856-3509

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council RGPIN-2021-03978, RGPIN-2020-05733
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein embeddings are the new main source of information about proteins, producing state-of-the-art solutions to many problems, including protein interaction prediction, a fundamental issue in proteomics. Understanding the embeddings and what causes the interactions is very important, as these models lack transparency due to their black-box nature. In the first study of its kind, we investigate the inner workings of these models using XAI (explainable AI) approaches. We perform extensive testing (3.3 TB of total data) involving nine of the best-known XAI methods on two problems: (i) the prediction of protein interaction sites using the current top method, Seq-InSite, and (ii) the production of protein embedding vectors using three methods, ProtBERT, ProtT5, and Ankh. The results are evaluated in terms of their ability to correlate with six basic amino acid properties-aromaticity, acidity/basicity, hydrophobicity, molecular mass, van der Waals volume, and dipole moment-as well as the propensity for interaction with other proteins, the impact of distant residues, and the infidelity scores of the XAI methods. The results are unexpected. Some XAI methods are much better than others at discovering essential information. Simple methods can be as good as advanced ones. Different protein embedding vectors can capture distinct properties, indicating significant room for improvement in embedding quality.

Indexed as

Deep LearningProteinsComputational BiologyHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsProtein Interaction MappingProteomicsProteinsprotein embeddingsprotein interactionsXAI methods

Identifiers

PMID40508065
PMCPMC12154934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.