ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
New Synthetic Opioids: What Do We Know About the Mutagenicity of Brorphine and Its Analogues?
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpol review of forensic drug chemistry, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026Review
- Genotoxic Potential of Metodesnitazene and Etodesnitazene: Insights with and Without S9 Metabolic Activation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive HPLC-HRMS/MS Targeted Screening Method to Detect 90 New Psychoactive Substances in Oral Fluid Samples.Biology · 2026Article
- In Vitro Cytotoxic and Genotoxic Evaluation of Nitazenes, a Potent Class of New Synthetic Opioids.Journal of xenobiotics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since 2019, a growing number of structurally diverse, non-Fentanyl-related novel synthetic opioids (NSOs) have emerged, but little is still known on the toxic profile of several of the molecules belonging to this class. Regarding long-term toxicity, few studies have investigated the genotoxic potential of NSOs, and no genotoxic data at all are available for the subclass of Brorphine-like benzimidazolone opioids. To deepen and broaden our understanding of their toxicological profile, this study was aimed at evaluating the genotoxicity of Brorphine and four of its analogues (Orphine, Fluorphine, Chlorphine and Iodorphine) on human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells employing a flow cytometric protocol of the "In Vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus (MN) test". The results show a statistically significant MNi increase for Fluorphine, Chlorphine and Iodorphine, but not for Brorphine and Orphine, demonstrating for the first three the ability to induce chromosomal damage. Afterwards, Brorphine and Orphine were tested on TK6 cells also in the presence of an exogenous metabolic activation system (S9 mix) to consider the possible genotoxic hazard posed by their metabolites as well. Also, under this experimental condition, no statistically significant increase in the MNi frequency was detected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.