ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Rewiring the Spine-Cutting-Edge Stem Cell Therapies for Spinal Cord Repair.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research on GM1 bound bMSCs loaded with SF hydrogel for spinal cord injury repair.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Regenerative Medicine Strategies for Spinal Cord Injury: Advances in Stem Cell Therapy.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Mesenchymal stem cells and secretome as modulators of neuroinflammation in neurological disorders.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Exosome-derived ncRNAs and proteins: inflammation regulatory mechanisms and biomarker potential in spinal cord injury.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
- CRISPR and Artificial Intelligence in Neuroregeneration: Closed-Loop Strategies for Precision Medicine, Spinal Cord Repair, and Adaptive Neuro-Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Applications of Tailored Mesoporous Silicate Nanomaterials in Regenerative Medicine and Theranostics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a debilitating neurological condition that leads to severe disabilities, significantly reducing patients' quality of life and imposing substantial societal and economic burdens. SCI involves a complex pathogenesis, including primary irreversible damage and secondary injury driven by neuroinflammation, apoptosis, and ischemia. Current treatments often provide limited efficacy, underscoring the urgent need for innovative therapeutic strategies. This paper aims to explore the potential use of stem cell (SC) therapy and exosome-based treatments as transformative approaches for managing SCI and mitigating associated disabilities. SCs, such as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), neural stem cells (NSCs), and embryonic stem cells (ESCs), demonstrate regenerative capabilities, including self-renewal, differentiation into neurons and glial cells, and modulation of the injury microenvironment. These properties enable SCs to reduce inflammation, inhibit apoptosis, and promote neuronal regeneration in preclinical models. Exosome-based therapies, derived from SCs, offer a novel alternative by addressing challenges like immune rejection and tumorigenicity. Exosomes deliver biomolecules, such as miRNAs, fostering anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, and pro-regenerative effects. They have shown efficacy in improving motor function, reducing glial scarring, and enhancing axonal regrowth in SCI models. The objective of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review of SC therapy and exosome-based approaches, emphasizing their potential to revolutionize SCI management while addressing ethical concerns, immune rejection, and the need for large-scale clinical trials. These therapies hold promise for improving recovery outcomes and alleviating the profound disabilities associated with SCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.