ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Optimizing Infrazygomatic Miniscrew Insertion Parameters: Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis of Bone Thickness by Insertion Height, Angulation, and Anatomical Position.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07269951 (Assessment of Bone Thickness in the Infrazygomatic Crest and Proper Insertion Angle for Miniscrew Positioning), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Assessment of Bone Thickness in the Infrazygomatic Crest and Proper Insertion Angle for Miniscrew Positioning: A Retrospective CBCT Study
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Panoramic Infrazygomatic Crest Length: A Craniofacial Physiology-Based Analysis of Skeletal Class (I-III) and Sex in a Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.