Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40507697›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Green Endoscopy: A Review of Global Perspectives on Environmental Sustainability of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

Adishwar Rao, Abdullah Sultany, Amlish Gondal, Raja Chandra Chakinala, Hareesha Rishab Bharadwaj, Saurabh Chandan, Hassam Ali, Sheza Malik, Saqr Alsakarneh, Dushyant Singh Dahiya

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Paving the way for green endoscopy in Saudi Arabia: A call for sustainable gastroenterology practice.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Adishwar RaoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Guthrie Robert Packer Hospital, Sayre, PA 18840, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1744-4217
Abdullah SultanyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Guthrie Robert Packer Hospital, Sayre, PA 18840, USA.
Amlish GondalDepartment of Internal Medicine, Guthrie Robert Packer Hospital, Sayre, PA 18840, USA.
Raja Chandra ChakinalaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Guthrie Robert Packer Hospital, Sayre, PA 18840, USA.
Hareesha Rishab BharadwajFaculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7979-2834
Saurabh ChandanCenter for Interventional Endoscopy (CIE), Advent Health, Orlando, FL 32803, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2661-6693
Hassam AliDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, ECU Health Medical Center/Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC 27834, USA.
Sheza MalikDepartment of Internal Medicine, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY 14621, USA.
Saqr AlsakarnehDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8776-2176
Dushyant Singh DahiyaDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Motility, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS 66103, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8544-9039

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic procedures are the cornerstone of intervention in gastroenterology-from evaluating common illnesses to non-surgically managing complex diseases. Expectedly, these procedures are linked to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions globally and contribute significantly to the global climate change crisis. Professional gastroenterology societies globally raise awareness of this evolving crisis and suggest specific measures to appropriately measure the burden contributed by endoscopy units and mitigate the environmental impact of this common clinical practice. To the unsuspecting eye, the solution to this crisis is relatively simple: decrease the utilization of endoscopic procedures. However, the dependence of modern medicine on these procedures, both diagnostically and therapeutically, makes it significantly more challenging to reduce their utilization. Instead, a structured approach to systematically consider the specific indications for each procedure, minimize waste generation, promote recycling of waste products, and limit the number of repeat endoscopies until clinically necessary may be more pragmatic to reduce GHG emissions globally. In this narrative review, we discuss the perspectives of global gastroenterology societies on sustainable or "green" endoscopy and summarize their recommendations to aid the day-to-day gastroenterologist in making their contribution to environmental sustainability while providing optimal care to their patients.

Indexed as

carbon footprintemissionsgreen endoscopygreenhouse gasessustainable endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID40507697
PMCPMC12156243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.