Clinical and Patient-Focused Outcomes After Percutaneous Screw Fixation of Pelvic Ring Fractures in Older Adults.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Avoiding pitfalls in percutaneous acetabular column screw placement using combined fluoroscopic check-point views: a technical note and case series.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026
   Article
2. Percutaneous fixation of posterior pelvic ring lesions in the elderly: current evidence and recent advances.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
   Review
3. Mortality of Nonoperatively Managed Geriatric Pelvic Ring Fractures.Cureus · 2026
   Article
4. Minimally invasive percutaneous cannulated screw fixation for pelvic fractures: a retrospective case cohort study of clinical and radiological outcomes.Frontiers in medicine · 2026
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as