ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Foretelling the Future: Preimplantation Genetic Testing and the Coming of Polygenic Embryo Screening.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Public perceptions of polygenic testing and embryo selection for non-medical traits.Nature human behaviour · 2026Article
- [Application of polygenic risk score-based comprehensive breast cancer risk assessment in preimplantation embryo selection for aZhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2026Article
- The Use of Stem Cells in Assisted Reproduction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) has been used in various forms over the last two decades. PGT involves testing early embryos following in vitro fertilization and has now become an accepted part of genetic testing. Nowadays, PGT serves as a resource for couples who have a family history of monogenic disorders, wherein the fetus is at high risk of inheriting the condition. PGT is also used to improve pregnancy outcomes in IVF patients in cases of recurrent IVF implantation failure, recurrent miscarriages, as well as male factor. It is also used in screening for sex-linked disorders and sourcing stem cells for therapy. The latest PGT direction is polygenic embryo screening (PES, PGT-P), which allows the identification of embryos that are at elevated risk for significant diseases in adulthood, such as coronary artery disease (CAD), diabetes, hypertension, and breast cancer. As the prevalence and the potential for the use of PES grow, fundamental ethical issues have been underlined, raising concerns about the broader implications of genetic testing. This narrative review summarizes indications, methods, applications, and limitations for PGT, with a particular focus on PES.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.