ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Pancreatic Cystic Fluid Biochemical and Genetic Analysis for the Differentiation Between Mucinous and Non-Mucinous Pancreatic Cystic Lesions.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- EUS-Anchored Multimodal Evaluation of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: Toward a Conceptual Diagnostic Framework.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF INTRADUCTAL PAPILLARY MUCINOUS NEOPLASMS: A NARRATIVE REVIEW BASED ON INTERNATIONAL GUIDELINES.Arquivos de gastroenterologia · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are increasingly identified via computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR), with a prevalence of 2-45%. Distinguishing mucinous PCLs (M-PCLs), which include intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) and mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs) that can progress to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, from non-mucinous PCLs (NM-PCLs) is essential. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) remains widely used but often demonstrates limited sensitivity and specificity. In contrast, endoscopic ultrasound-guided measurement of intracystic glucose more accurately differentiates PCL subtypes, as tumor-related metabolic changes lower cyst fluid glucose in mucinous lesions. Numerous prospective and retrospective studies suggest a glucose cut-off between 30 and 50 mg/dL, yielding a sensitivity of 88-95% and specificity of 76-91%, frequently outperforming CEA. Additional benefits include immediate point-of-care assessment via standard glucometers and minimal interference from blood contamination. DNA-based biomarkers, including KRAS and GNAS mutations, enhance specificity (up to 99%) but exhibit moderate sensitivity (61-71%) and necessitate specialized, expensive platforms. Molecular analyses can be crucial in high-risk lesions, yet their uptake is constrained by technical challenges. In practice, combining glucose assessment with targeted molecular assays refines risk stratification and informs the choice between surgical resection or active surveillance. Future investigations should establish standardized glucose thresholds, improve the cost-effectiveness of genetic testing, and integrate advanced biomarkers into routine protocols. Ultimately, these strategies aim to optimize patient management, limit unnecessary interventions for benign lesions, and ensure timely therapy for lesions at risk of malignant transformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.