ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Minimally Invasive Surgery for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma-A Review of the Current Literature.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transitioning to the robotic era for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: initial implementation and outcomes in a single center.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Review
- Prognostic value of perioperative gamma-glutamyl transferase trajectories in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multicentre retrospective cohort study.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is the most common subtype of a rare malignancy arising from the biliary tract. Its challenging diagnosis results in delayed treatment, most often when the disease is locally advanced or widespread. Management includes surgery followed by systemic chemotherapy; however, a negative resection margin (R0) is the mainstay for achieving an adequate survival benefit, in the absence of metastatic disease. While minimally invasive surgery (MIS) initially is adopted across every surgical field, laparoscopy's inherent limitations hinder its implementation for the treatment of pCCA and results in skepticism even for the robotic approach. However, since its initial feasibility phase fifteen years ago, comparable results to open surgery have been reported regarding its safety and oncologic outcomes, in highly selected patients. Moreover, the robotic approach seems to be associated with favorable outcomes regarding post-operative complications, length of hospital stay, and estimated blood loss. International guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pCCA, centralization, definition of a learning curve for MIS, and more comparative studies assessing long term outcomes and randomization are key elements to ensure patient's safety and technical efficiency. The aim of our review is to provide an updated perspective of the existing literature in the utilization of MIS for patients with pCCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.