ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Exercise Prescription in Cardio-Oncology.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiovascular Imaging for the Early Detection of Cardiotoxicity from Emerging Cancer Therapies: Mechanistic Insights Across the Pediatric and Adult Spectrum.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Wearable-Based Assessment of Cardiac Recovery After a Modified Bruce Test in Women with Breast Cancer: Role of Physical Activity and Treatment Duration.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Exercise-specific post-translational modification signatures: unveiling precise regulatory mechanisms of molecular exercise language and cellular adaptation.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Review
- Current strategies for prevention of cancer therapy-related cardiotoxicity: pharmacological, non-pharmacological and emerging approaches.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Numerous studies underscore the benefits of exercise prescription in both cardiology and oncology. Recently, emerging eviAlessandro Navadence has highlighted the value of exercise in cardio-oncology, demonstrating its protective effects against the decline in functional capacity and cardiovascular complications that may arise in oncology patients, either as a result of the disease itself or as a side effect of chemotherapy. The purpose of this review is to elucidate the protective mechanisms and cardiovascular clinical benefits conferred by exercise prescription in cancer patients. Additionally, it aims to delineate the principal current exercise protocols that have been validated or proposed, outlining their respective advantages and limitations. Finally, we will explore future perspectives, particularly the development of precision medicine, supported by advancements in AI, to facilitate the creation of novel, personalized exercise protocols tailored to specific patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.