Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40507383›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

From Fear to Hope: Understanding Preparatory and Anticipatory Grief in Women with Cancer-A Public Health Approach to Integrating Screening, Compassionate Communication, and Psychological Support Strategies.

Jelena Milic, Milica Vucurovic, Edita Grego, Dragana Jovic, Rosa Sapic, Sladjana Jovic, Verica Jovanovic

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. PEC innovation · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Fear of Cancer Recurrence and Adaptation in Early Breast Cancer Survivorship: A Latent Profile Analysis.Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Challenges in fertility preservation among patients with cancer in Iran: A scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jelena MilicInstitute of Public Health of Serbia "Dr Milan Jovanović Batut", 112113 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-3596-5908
Milica VucurovicInstitute of Public Health of Serbia "Dr Milan Jovanović Batut", 112113 Belgrade, Serbia.
Edita GregoInstitute of Public Health of Serbia "Dr Milan Jovanović Batut", 112113 Belgrade, Serbia.
Dragana JovicInstitute of Public Health of Serbia "Dr Milan Jovanović Batut", 112113 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-2657-9909
Rosa SapicFaculty of Health Studies, University of Bjeljina, 76300 Bjeljina, Bosnia and Herzegovina.ORCID 0000-0001-7459-3353
Sladjana JovicFaculty of Security Studies, University of Belgrade, Gospodara Vučića 50, 11118 Belgrade, Serbia.
Verica JovanovicInstitute of Public Health of Serbia "Dr Milan Jovanović Batut", 112113 Belgrade, Serbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prolonged grief disorder, also known as post-loss grief, was officially recognized in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) after years of debate within the mental health community. However, while post-loss grief gained recognition, anticipatory and preparatory grief, which occur before a loss, have remained underexplored. Preparatory grief affects individuals nearing the end of life, while anticipatory grief impacts the loved ones of those who are about to die. These grief types are particularly prevalent among women, who are more vulnerable to their emotional and psychological challenges. The primary aim of this study was to investigate preparatory grief in women diagnosed with cancer and anticipatory grief in their loved ones, with the goal of developing management guidelines. The secondary objective was to identify protective factors, such as psychotherapeutic interventions and systemic support, to alleviate grief-related distress. This review synthesized evidence from the PubMed and Cochrane databases, covering studies from 1968 to 2020 and after the COVID-19 pandemic in 2023. The results revealed that anticipatory grief was common among loved ones, leading to increased emotional distress, while cancer patients experienced preparatory grief, facing both emotional and practical challenges. Both types of grief were associated with altered stress responses, such as lower diurnal cortisol levels. Psychotherapeutic interventions, particularly early and systemic psychotherapy, were found to effectively reduce symptoms of both anticipatory and preparatory grief, improving coping strategies and emotional well-being. The study concluded that empowering coping strategies and social support played key roles in enhancing emotional outcomes for both patients and their families.

Indexed as

adoptive copinganticipatory griefend of lifefamily systemic psychotherapypalliative carepreparatory griefpsycho-oncologypsychotherapy interventionsquality of life with cancersocial support

Identifiers

PMID40507383
PMCPMC12156240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.