ReviewCancers2025
Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma: An Update.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Giant low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma with extensive sex cord-like differentiation: a case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- Metastatic Uterine Sarcomas: A Retrospective Analysis on Clinical Outcomes and Biology.Cureus · 2026Article
- Review
- How I treat soft tissue sarcomas.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Review
- Mapping Metastatic Spread in Uterine Sarcoma: A Population-Based Analysis of First Metastatic Patterns and Outcomes.Cancers · 2026Article
- Extra-uterine Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma of the Stomach Mimicking a Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumour: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- An Update on Uterine Smooth Muscle Tumors: Is It a Leiomyoma, a STUMP, or a Leiomyosarcoma?Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Clinicopathologic and Immunohistochemical Correlates of Disease-Free Survival in Endometrial Stromal Sarcomas: A Multicenter Retrospective Study From 2017 to 2025.Journal of clinical medicine research · 2026Article
- High-grade uterine endometrial stromal sarcoma harboring GLI1 and MDM2/CDK4 co-amplifications.Diagnostic pathology · 2025Article
- Uterine Stroma-Derived Tumors and the Extracellular Matrix: A Comparative Review of Benign and Malignant Pathologies.Cancers · 2025Review
- Multidisciplinary management of intracardiac tumor thrombus in low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) is a rare malignant tumor of uterine mesenchyme, accounting for 15-20% of uterine sarcomas. It is classified into low-grade (LG-ESS) and high-grade (HG-ESS) subtypes, each defined by distinct histopathological and molecular features. LG-ESS exhibits slow progression, resembling proliferative-phase endometrial stroma, with genetic alterations like JAZF1-SUZ12 fusions. HG-ESS is more aggressive, characterized by high mitotic activity, necrosis, and genetic markers such as BCOR internal tandem duplication, often leading to advanced-stage diagnosis. Surgical resection is the cornerstone for managing early-stage ESS. A total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) is recommended to prevent recurrence. Fertility-preserving approaches may be considered in LG-ESS but are associated with high recurrence rates. Lymphadenectomy is not routinely performed, given its limited prognostic value. HG-ESS, due to its aggressiveness, often requires additional treatment, including chemotherapy. Adjuvant therapy varies by subtype. LG-ESS responds well to hormonal treatments such as aromatase inhibitors and progestins, while tamoxifen is contraindicated. HG-ESS, lacking hormonal receptor expression, is managed with chemotherapy, often incorporating doxorubicin-based regimens. Radiotherapy may improve local control in select cases but shows limited impact on overall survival. Advanced-stage ESS treatment focuses on complete cytoreduction, supplemented by systemic therapies. Hormonal therapy remains the standard for advanced LG-ESS, whereas HG-ESS relies on chemotherapy. Prognosis depends on the subtype and stage. LG-ESS has favorable outcomes, with five-year survival exceeding 90% in early stages, but recurrent disease remains common. HG-ESS is associated with poorer survival due to its aggressive nature. Advances in molecular profiling offer promising avenues for personalized therapies, integrating genomic insights with targeted treatments to improve outcomes in this rare malignancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.