Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40507372›Full record

ReviewCancers2025

Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma: An Update.

Giulio Ricotta, Silvio Andrea Russo, Anna Fagotti, Alejandra Martinez, Elodie Gauroy, Mathilde Del, Valentin Thibaud, Bataillon Guillaume, Gwenaël Ferron

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. How I treat soft tissue sarcomas.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Giulio RicottaSurgical Oncology, Oncopole Claudius Regaud-Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole, 31100 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5897-5650
Silvio Andrea RussoSurgical Oncology, Oncopole Claudius Regaud-Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole, 31100 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0009-0000-9060-1501
Anna FagottiGynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Women, Child and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Alejandra MartinezSurgical Oncology, Oncopole Claudius Regaud-Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole, 31100 Toulouse, France.
Elodie GauroySurgical Oncology, Oncopole Claudius Regaud-Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole, 31100 Toulouse, France.
Mathilde DelSurgical Oncology, Oncopole Claudius Regaud-Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole, 31100 Toulouse, France.
Valentin ThibaudOncology, Oncopole Claudius Regaud-Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole, 31100 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3189-8445
Bataillon GuillaumeAnatomopathology, Oncopole Claudius Regaud-Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole, 31100 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2013-1668
Gwenaël FerronSurgical Oncology, Oncopole Claudius Regaud-Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole, 31100 Toulouse, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) is a rare malignant tumor of uterine mesenchyme, accounting for 15-20% of uterine sarcomas. It is classified into low-grade (LG-ESS) and high-grade (HG-ESS) subtypes, each defined by distinct histopathological and molecular features. LG-ESS exhibits slow progression, resembling proliferative-phase endometrial stroma, with genetic alterations like JAZF1-SUZ12 fusions. HG-ESS is more aggressive, characterized by high mitotic activity, necrosis, and genetic markers such as BCOR internal tandem duplication, often leading to advanced-stage diagnosis. Surgical resection is the cornerstone for managing early-stage ESS. A total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) is recommended to prevent recurrence. Fertility-preserving approaches may be considered in LG-ESS but are associated with high recurrence rates. Lymphadenectomy is not routinely performed, given its limited prognostic value. HG-ESS, due to its aggressiveness, often requires additional treatment, including chemotherapy. Adjuvant therapy varies by subtype. LG-ESS responds well to hormonal treatments such as aromatase inhibitors and progestins, while tamoxifen is contraindicated. HG-ESS, lacking hormonal receptor expression, is managed with chemotherapy, often incorporating doxorubicin-based regimens. Radiotherapy may improve local control in select cases but shows limited impact on overall survival. Advanced-stage ESS treatment focuses on complete cytoreduction, supplemented by systemic therapies. Hormonal therapy remains the standard for advanced LG-ESS, whereas HG-ESS relies on chemotherapy. Prognosis depends on the subtype and stage. LG-ESS has favorable outcomes, with five-year survival exceeding 90% in early stages, but recurrent disease remains common. HG-ESS is associated with poorer survival due to its aggressive nature. Advances in molecular profiling offer promising avenues for personalized therapies, integrating genomic insights with targeted treatments to improve outcomes in this rare malignancy.

Indexed as

endometrial stromal sarcomagynecologic oncologyuterine sarcoma

Identifiers

PMID40507372
PMCPMC12153635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.